Mustafa ZungurI
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0012
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QT dispersion and echocardiographic parameters in patients before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).AS = Aortic valve stenosis
ATP = Adenosine triphosphate
AV = Atrioventricular
AVA = Aortic valve area
AVR = Aortic valve replacement
BMI = Body mass index
BNP = Brain natriuretic peptide
CABG = Coronary artery bypass grafting
DBP = Diastolic blood pressure
ECG = Electrocardiogram
EuroSCORE = European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation
HR = Heart rate
IVSDT = Interventricular septum diastolic thickness
LDL = Low-density lipoprotein
LVEF = Left ventricular ejection fraction
LVH = Left ventricular hypertrophy
LVIDD = Left ventricular internal diastolic diameter
LVMI = Left ventricular mass index
PCI = Percutaneous coronary intervention
PWTd = Posterior wall thickness diameter
QTcd = Corrected QT dispersion
QTd = QT dispersion
SBP = Systolic blood pressure
SPSS = Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
STS = Society of Thoracic Surgeons
TAVI = Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
VF = Ventricular fibrillation
VT = Ventricular tachycardia
INTRODUCTION
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has recently become an effective therapeutic alternative to surgical treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS), particularly for those who were considered as high-risk surgical or inoperable patients. When compared with medical therapy alone, untreated severe AS has a high rate of morbidity and mortality[1,2]. TAVI has been suggested to be more reliable in high-risk surgical or inoperable patients in recent studies[3-6].
In patients with severe symptomatic AS, it has been postulated that malignant ventricular arrhythmias play a vital role in the outcomes and sudden cardiac death[7].
QT dispersion (QTd) is the maximum inter-variance between the longest and shortest QT intervals recorded on a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). It reflects the homogeneity of myocardial repolarization[8]. In addition, QTd can be used as a probable prognostic tool for future ventricular tachyarrhythmias and death[9,10].
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) due to chronic pressure stress is a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death[11]. Increased QTd has been reported in AS patients and has also been shown to be a potential marker for ventricular arrhythmic homogeneity and mortality. QTd reduction by surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) has also been reported[8]. For these reasons, I would like to investigate the effect of TAVI on QTd in patients with severe AS in this study.
METHODS
Study Design and Patients
A total of 152 patients with severe AS were followed up prospectively. Ninety-five of these patients underwent AVR with TAVI method. Patients who were found to be suitable for TAVI by the heart team council of our center were included in the TAVI group. Patients who were suitable for surgical AVR were not included in the study. The study was conducted between June 2013 and December 2015. The patients who underwent AVR with TAVI were included in the TAVI group (n=95); the patients who refused TAVI were included in the medical treatment group (n=57). Patients who had atrial fibrillation or flutter, frequent (> 10/min) ventricular extrasystoles, sinus or atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, permanent cardiac pacemaker, abnormal serum electrolyte levels, congenital long-QT syndrome, who had been taking any drugs influencing QTd and using antiarrhythmic drugs, with new bundle branch block, or who had become pacemaker dependents after TAVI were excluded. Operative risks for patients were calculated using the Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Predictive Risk of Mortality scores. Patients with a Logistic EuroSCORE >20% or an STS score >10% were considered as high-risk patients.
Clinical, demographic, 12-lead ECG, and echocardiographic data, procedural variables, and morbidity and mortality rates were recorded for the first and sixth months and the first year following TAVI. First and sixth months and first year follow-up visits after the discharge of patients were performed at our center.
The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all the study-related procedures were performed according to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration. All patients signed an informed consent form prior to their participation in the study.
Electrocardiography
Standard 12-lead ECG (25 mm/s) was recorded after a 10-minute rest in the supine position before TAVI and at the first and sixth months after TAVI. QTd calculation was manually performed by two independent cardiologists who were blinded to all patients’ data. The compatibilities of QTd were statistically analyzed. If there was a difference between the results of QTd, the final decision was made by consensus. The QT interval was measured from the onset of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave. The mean of three consecutive interval measurements was used in the analysis. QTd was calculated as the difference between the longest and shortest QT interval measured in each individual ECG lead. QT intervals were corrected with Bazett’s formula (QTc:QT√RR).
Echocardiography
Patients were evaluated with standard transthoracic M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic studies before and after TAVI procedure. Left ventricular diastolic and systolic dimensions and ventricular septal and posterior wall thicknesses were measured at the level of the tips of the mitral valve leaflet. Severe AS was described as a mean aortic valve gradient of ≥ 40 mmHg or an aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤ 1 cm2.
Study Procedures
A mean aortic gradient >40 mmHg, an AVA <1 cm2, and a valve area index (valve area/body surface area) <0.6 cm2 were considered severe AS[1]. Edwards SAPIEN XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA) balloon-expandable device (n=85) and Medtronic CoreValve (MCV; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) self-expandable device (n=10) were used for TAVI. A vascular occlusion device (ProStar XL, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used in eligible patients in terms of femoral artery diameter and anatomy. The surgical cutdown method was applied in patients who were unsuitable for using the iliac and femoral artery vascular closure device. Transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography were done to determine the diameter of the aortic bioprosthesis. Patients received clopidogrel 75 mg, aspirin 100 mg, and intravenous antibiotherapy before the procedure.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. The normal distribution of values was assessed by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and histogram. Paired t-test, independent sample t-test, and Wilcoxon-rank test were used for continuous variables, when appropriate. Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficient were used to assess the relationship between the parameters, when appropriate. A P-value < 0.05 represented a statistically significant result. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), version 16.0.
RESULTS
A total of 152 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. TAVI was successfully performed in 47 (49.4%) women and 48 (50.6%) men without severe complications during the hospital stay and follow-up period. Demographic characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1 and basal echocardiographic and electrocardiographic characteristics in Table 2. The baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. There was no difference in baseline echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and other clinical parameters. No difference was found between these two groups’ in basal QTd, corrected QT dispersion (QTcd), and other electrocardiographic measurements, like heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, and QRS axis (Table 2). However, TAVI caused a significant reduction in the mean aortic valve gradient, QTd, and QTcd after six months (Table 3). In the sixth month after TAVI, mean aortic gradients, maximum and minimum QT times, QTd, and QTcd time were significantly decreased in the TAVI group, compared to the medical treatment group. Moreover, the QTd significantly decreased in the TAVI group after the TAVI procedure (Table 4). Mortality and arrhythmic complications were found to be smaller in the TAVI group at one-year follow-up than in the medical treatment group (Table 5).
TAVI (n=95) |
Medical treatment (n=57) |
P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 78.1±7.3 | 80±6.5 | 0.675 |
Male | 50(%52.6) | 29(%50.8) | 0.854 |
BMI | 27.6±5.6 | 29.4±3.5 | 0.657 |
HR | 78.3±9.4 | 80±8.6 | 0.346 |
SBP | 129±25 | 135±15 | 0.435 |
DBP | 82±14 | 78±22 | 0.358 |
Previous CABG | 28(%29.4) | 18(%31.5) | 0.254 |
Previous PCI | 36(%37.8) | 21(%36.8) | 0.342 |
LVEF | 45.1±10.6 | 43.2±5.5 | 0.345 |
Logistic EuroSCORE | 33.4±10.9 | 35.5±9.4 | 0.375 |
STS Score | 13.5±6.5 | 14.5±7.5 | 0.554 |
BNP | 7793±2450 | 6850±2850 | 0.455 |
LDL | 135.4±27.2 | 142±32.5 | 0.550 |
Triglyceride | 145.2±35.1 | 152±25.5 | 0.650 |
Hematocrit | 36.2±5 | 34.5±6.5 | 0.385 |
Creatine | 1.21±0.55 | 1.42±0.40 | 0.545 |
BMI=body mass index; BNP=brain natriuretic peptide; CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting; DBP=diastolic blood pressure; EuroSCORE = European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; HR=heart rate; LDL=low-density lipoprotein; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; SBP=systolic blood pressure; STS=Society of Thoracic Surgeons; TAVI=transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Parameters | TAVI (n=95) | Medical treatment (n=57) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Heart rate | 78.7±9.7 | 76.1±10.1 | 0.872 |
LVIDD | 52.1±5.9 | 50.8±5.1 | 0.323 |
IVSDT | 13.7±1.5 | 13.8±1.7 | 0.860 |
PWTd | 12.7±1.3 | 12.9±1.1 | 0.761 |
LVMI | 259.7±12.1 | 246±15 | 0.145 |
Mean aortic gradient | 50.1±10.8 | 49.3±12.5 | 0.689 |
Max aortic gradient | 86.2±11.5 | 83.6±14.2 | 0.370 |
Max QT | 443.7±61.7 | 445.2±51.8 | 0.779 |
Min QT | 350.2±30.2 | 352.3±34.8 | 0.923 |
QTd | 119.7±24.1 | 123.5±23.1 | 0.096 |
QTcd | 136.8±23.3 | 135.2±20.8 | 0.679 |
Parameters | Before TAVI | 6th month after TAVI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
SBP | 129.2±21.1 | 127.8±22.6 | 0.655 |
DBP | 75.4±9.5 | 79.2±13.8 | 0.635 |
Heart rate | 78.7±9.7 | 75.8±11.2 | 0.285 |
LVIDD | 52.1±5.9 | 51.3±4.2 | 0.355 |
IVSDT | 13.7±1.5 | 12.8±2.2 | 0.240 |
PWTd | 12.7±1.3 | 12.3±1.7 | 0.205 |
LVMI | 259.7±12.1 | 241±12 | 0.230 |
Mean aortic gradient | 50.1±10.8 | 12.7±4.6 | <0.001 |
Max aortic gradient | 86.2±11.5 | 26±5.6 | <0.001 |
Max QT | 443.7±61.7 | 355±45 | <0.001 |
Min QT | 350.2±30.2 | 310±38 | <0.001 |
QTd | 119.7±24.1 | 105±27 | <0.001 |
QTcd | 136.8±23.3 | 110±24 | <0.001 |
DBP=diastolic blood pressure; IVSDT=interventricular septum diastolic thickness; LVIDD=left ventricular internal diastolic diameter; LVMI=left ventricular mass index; PWTd=posterior wall thickness diameter; SBP=systolic blood pressure; QTcd=corrected QT dispersion; QTd=QT dispersion; TAVI=transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Parameters | TAVI (at the 6th month) |
Medical treatment (at the 6th month) |
P-value |
---|---|---|---|
SBP | 127.8±22.6 | 126.2±15.1 | 0.470 |
DBP | 79.2±13.8 | 78.1±12.1 | 0.580 |
Heart rate | 75.8±11.2 | 74.2±10.5 | 0.390 |
LVIDD | 51.3±4.2 | 50.2±3.8 | 0.385 |
IVSDT | 12.8±2.2 | 13.7±2.8 | 0.375 |
PWTd | 12.3±1.7 | 13.1±2.5 | 0.345 |
LVMI | 241±12 | 248±25 | 0.350 |
Mean aortic gradient | 12.7±4.6 | 51.7±11.8 | <0.001 |
Max aortic gradient | 26±5.6 | 86.7±15.5 | <0.001 |
Max QT | 355±45 | 457.3±52.1 | <0.001 |
Min QT | 310±38 | 358.8±31.7 | <0.001 |
QTd | 105±27 | 132.5±28.5 | <0.001 |
QTcd | 110±24 | 141.2±18.5 | <0.001 |
DBP=diastolic blood pressure; IVSDT=interventricular septum diastolic thickness; LVIDD=left ventricular internal diastolic diameter; LVMI=left ventricular mass index; PWTd=posterior wall thickness diameter; SBP=systolic blood pressure; QTcd=corrected QT dispersion; QTd=QT dispersion; TAVI=transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Parameters | TAVI (1st year) |
Medical treatment (1st year) |
P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Mortality | 6 (%6.3) | 11 (%19.3) | 0.015 |
Total AV block (permanent or temporary) | 9 (%9.5) | 6(%10.5) | 0.520 |
Pacemaker implantation | 4 (%4.2) | 4 (%7.0) | 0.346 |
Ventricular tachycardia | 6 (%6.3) | 14 (%24.6) | 0.002 |
Ventricular fibrillation | 3 (%3.2) | 8 (%14.0) | 0.016 |
DISCUSSION
The number of patients with degenerative aortic valve disease is expected to rise in the future. And adults may remain asymptomatic for a long time[12]. After heart failure, syncope, and angina, the survival time is shortened[1]. Surgical AVR is now the gold standard treatment for patients with severe symptomatic AS. However, some severe symptomatic AS patients may present a very high risk for surgery due to contraindications or comorbidities. They cannot be operated on or are considered high risk for surgery. TAVI is a well-known alternative technique for these patients[4,13].
In patients with symptomatic AS, malignant ventricular arrhythmias play an important role in the development of syncope and sudden cardiac death[14]. Some studies have shown that ventricular arrhythmias are more frequent in these patients than in control subjects[15]. ECG of the patients before, during, and after syncope were investigated and malignant ventricular arrhythmia was detected during syncope.
QTd, which increases the formation of ventricular arrhythmias, can be calculated from the surface ECG reflecting regional heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization[16]. Many disorders, such as ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial ischemia, autonomic neuropathy, electrolyte imbalance, and use of antiarrhythmic drugs, can cause impaired repolarization and increased QTd.
In our study, we investigated the effect of TAVI on QTd in patients with symptomatic severe AS. We found out that QTd decreased in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI at the sixth postprocedure month.
In our study, six patients (6.3%) died in the TAVI group and 11 (19.3%) patients died in the medical treatment group. One-year mortality was significantly lower in the TAVI group (P<0.001) than in the medical treatment group. The ratio of ventricular tachycardia (VT) (P<0.001) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (P<0.001) was significantly higher in the medical treatment group than in the TAVI group during Holter monitoring, outpatient visits, and emergency department admissions. In our study, QTd and QTcd time after AVR with TAVI method were significantly shorter than in the medical treatment group.
Arrhythmogenesis depends on the modulation of ion currents, abnormal ventricular structure, and myocardial ischemia[17]. Ventricular dilation and fibrosis may affect different regions of the ventricular wall and may cause an increase in the spread of refractory areas. The evidence of increased QTd in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, acquired forms of long QT syndrome, uremic neuropathy, hypertension in patients with myocardial infarction, and LVH supports the theorem above[17]. The effects of AVR on QTd were evaluated by two studies in the literature. Darbar et al.[18] have shown that increased QTd after AVR in patients with significant AS is reduced. This finding was later reported by Orlowska-Baranowska et al.[19]. Patients with LVH were also reported to have had myocardial ischemia despite normal coronary angiograms. Thallium scans of patients with significant AS and normal coronary arteries often show perfusion deficits due to microvascular dysfunction[20]. Microvascular dysfunction leads to a marked remodeling of the cellular compartments of the myocardium. At the cellular level, studies have shown that adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channels are more likely to be opened during ischemia in hypertrophic myocytes compared to normal myocytes. This may prolong the repolarization of the myocardium allowing subsequent depolarisations and triggered activity that initiate ventricular arrhythmias[21].
Another mechanism is the increased myocardial interstitial fibrosis in LVH and it has significant effects on electrical conduction[22]. Increased myocardial interstitial fibrosis, intraventricular conduction, and nonhomogeneous repolarization facilitate micro-reentry, and arrhythmia can lead to electrical abnormalities in electrical connections between myocardial fibers[23].
In addition, the cardiac renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activates the gene expression of collagen and fibronectin. This probably contributes to an increase in total collagen volume in the myocardium[24]. On the contrary, AS corrupts coronary blood flow. For this reason, hypertrophy and ischemic heart muscles may cause electrophysiological changes.
Previous studies have shown that heterozygosity in repolarization is a predisposed situation to life-threatening arrhythmias, such as VT and VF. The electrical imbalance of the heart muscle can be detected by QTd using surface ECG.
The recovery of autonomic functions appears to be another way of explaining the effect of TAVI on repolarization markers. Patients with severe AS have reported increased sympathetic nervous system activity and reduced sympathetic baroreflex gain. They also demonstrated normalization of sympathetic nervous system activity and restoration of arterial baroreflex gain after TAVI. Increased sympathetic activity has been shown to increase QT interval. It can be suggested that autonomic dysfunction may increase ventricular repolarization abnormalities and QTd. Mechanical obstruction is significantly reduced after TAVI procedure and cardiac output is increased. And this induces improvement of autonomic dysfunction.
Study Limitations
Our study has some limitations. The small sample size was the main limitation. Coronary ischemia is improved after TAVI and can reduce fatal arrhythmias, but there was no objective criterion for its distinction; another limitation was that arrhythmia complications in both groups could not be determined exactly. Only in the first and sixth months, patients were evaluated by Holter monitoring. ECG controls were performed only in the third and sixth months and the first year in the outpatient clinic. However, apart from these periods, arrhythmic complications may have occurred.
CONCLUSION
In our study, postprocedure changes in cardiac conduction times and intervals showed positive changes after TAVI. QTd is one of them. According to the results of our study, QTd is more closely related to mortality and malignant arrhythmias in patients with severe AS treated medically than patients who underwent TAVI. It was determined that mortality and malignant arrhythmia rates were reversed with positive changes in QTd after TAVI.
Long-term recording is therefore better for assessing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients. For this reason our results should be confirmed with further studies to determine the effectiveness of TAVI on arrhythmic mortality and morbidity.
REFERENCES
1. Turina J, Hess O, Sepulcri F, Krayenbuehl HP. Spontaneous course ofaortic valve disease. Eur Heart J. 1987;8(5):471-83.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062307.
2. Cribier A. Development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI): a 20-year odyssey. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;105(3):146-52.doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2012.01.005.
3. Figulla L, Neumann A, Figulla HR, Kahlert P, Erbel R, Neumann T.Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacycompared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature. ClinRes Cardiol. 2011;100(4):265-76. doi:10.1007/s00392-010-0268-x.
4. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al.Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients whocannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1597-607.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008232.
5. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, etal. Transcatheter aortic- valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. NEngl J Med. 2014;370(19):1790-8. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1400590.
6. Yamamoto M, Meguro K, Mouillet G, Bergoend E, Monin JL, Lim P, etal. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation in patients aged ≥90 years versus <90 years. Am JCardiol. 2012;110(8):1156-63.doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.058.
7. Sorgato A, Faggiano P, Aurigemma GP, Rusconi C, Gaasch WH.Ventricular arrhythmias in adult aortic stenosis. Prevalence, mechanism, andclinical relevance. Chest. 1998;113(2):482-91.doi:10.1378/chest.113.2.482.
8. Cowan JC, Yusoff K, Moore M, Amos PA, Gold AE, Bourke JP, et al.Importance of lead selection in QT interval measurement. Am J Cardiol.1988;61(1):83-7. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)91309-4.
9. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Howard BV, Fabsitz RR, Lee ET, Welty TK.Assessment of QT interval and QT dispersion for prediction of all-cause andcardiovascular mortality in American Indians: the strong heart study.Circulation. 2000;101(1):61-6. doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.1.61.
10. de Bruyne MC, Hoes AW, Kors JA, Hofman A, van Bemmel JH, Grobbee DE.QTc dispersion predicts cardiac mortality in the elderly: the Rotterdam study.Circulation. 1998;97(5):467-72. doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.5.467.
11. Levy D, Anderson KM, Plehn J, Savage DD, Christiansen JC, CastelliWP. Echocardiographically determined left ventricular structural and functionalcorrelates of complex or frequent ventricular arrhythmias on one-hour ambulatoryelectrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(8):836-40.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(87)91102-7.
12. Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet.2009;373(9667):956-66. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60211-7.
13. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al.Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. NEngl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187-98. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1103510.
14. Sorgato A, Faggiano P, Aurigemma GP, Rusconi C, Gaasch WH.Ventricular arrhythmias in adult aortic stenosis. Prevalence, mechanism, andclinical relevance. Chest. 1998;113(2):482-91.doi:10.1378/chest.113.2.482.
15. Schwartz LS, Goldfischer J, Sprague GJ, Schwartz SP. Syncope andsudden death in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1969;23(5):647-58.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(69)90025-3.
16. Sorgato A, Faggiano P, Simoncelli U, Rusconi C. Prevalence of latepotentials in adult aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol.1996;53(1):55-9.
17. Martínez-Useros C, Tornos P, Montoyo J, Permanyer Miralda G,Alijarde M, García del Castillo H, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias in aorticvalve disease: a further marker of impaired left ventricular function. Int JCardiol. 1992;34(1):49-56. doi:10.1016/0167-5273(92)90081-D. [MedLine]
18. Darbar D, Cherry C J, Kerins DM. QT dispersion is reduced aftervalve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart. 1999;82(1):15-8.doi:10.1136/hrt.82.1.15.
19. Orlowska-Baranowska E, Baranowski R, Kusmierczyk B, Sepiska J.Reduction of the QT interval dispersion after aortic valve replacement reflectschanges in electrical function rather than structural remodeling. J Heart ValveDis. 2005;14(2):181-5.
20. Cameron JS, Kimura S, Jackson-Burns DA, Smith DB, Bassett AL.ATP-sensitive K+ channels are altered in hypertrophied ventricular myocytes. AmJ Physiol. 1988;255(5 pt 2):H1254-8.doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1988.255.5.H1254.
21. Kupari M, Virtanen KS, Turto H, Viitasalo M, Mänttäri M, Lindroos M,et al. Exclusion of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomographyin patients with aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70(6):635-40.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90204-c.
22. Weber KT, Brilla CG. Pathological hypertrophy and cardiacinterstitium. Fibrosis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Circulation.1991;83(6):1849-65. doi:10.1161/01.cir.83.6.1849.
23. Spach MS, Josephson ME. Initiating reentry: the role of nonuniformanisotropy in small circuits. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994;5(2):182-209.doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1994.tb01157.x. [MedLine]
24. Fielitz J, Hein S, Mitrovic V, Pregla R, Zurbrügg HR, Warnecke C, etal. Activation of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system and increased myocardialcollagen expression in human aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol.2001;37(5):1443-9. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01170-6
No financial support.
No conflict of interest.
Author's roles & responsibilities
MZ Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
Article receive on Monday, January 14, 2019
Article accepted on Friday, May 3, 2019