lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed




Morphometrical quantification of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms

Lucas José Tachotti PIRESI; Paulo Sampaio GutierrezII

DOI: 10.1590/S0102-76382007000300009


Objective: Atherosclerotic inflammation, with a possible role of infectious agents, could contribute to the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Finding of Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP) in these lesions in previous, non-quantifying studies ranged from 0-100%. The objective is to quantify the presence of CP and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) in AAA. Methods: Thickness, number of cells positive for CP by immunohistochemistry and percent area occupied by MP, detected by "in situ" hybridization in the three layers of the aorta, were measured in the three aortic layers using an image-analysis system in 10 necropsy abdominal aneurysmatic aortas. Three groups of controls were used: 1) samples of the same aortas, outside the aneurysms, except if the dilatation took the whole sub-renal portion of the artery (n=7); 2) aortas with severe atherosclerosis but without aneurysms (n=10); 3) aortas with no or mild atherosclerosis (n=10). All specimens were obtained at necropsies. Wald's test was used to compare groups; significance level was established at 5%. Results: The intima was thinner and the media thicker in the normal cases than in the other groups (p<0.01). Positive cells for CP were found in all groups, more frequently at the adventitia; no significant difference was detected between them (p>0.05). MP was also detect in all groups. This agent predominated in the group of patients with atherosclerosis, but no aneurysms at both intima and adventitia; nevertheless, differences between the groups were not significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: our data suggest that the bacteria we focused have not an important role in the pathogenesis of AAA.


Objetivo: A inflamação aterosclerótica, com possível papel de agentes infecciosos, pode contribuir na patogênese dos aneurismas da aorta abdominal (AAA). O achado de Chamydia pneumoniae (CP) nessas lesões, em estudos prévios, sem quantificação, variou de 0-100%. O objetivo é quantificar a presença de CP e de Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) nos AAA. Método: A espessura, o número de células positivas para CP detectadas por imunoperoxidase e a porcentagem de área ocupada por MP detectada por hibridização "in situ", nas três camadas da aorta, foram medidos com sistema de análise de imagens, em 10 aortas abdominais aneurismáticas. Usou-se três grupos-controle: 1) amostras das mesmas aortas, fora do aneurisma, exceto se a dilatação tomasse toda a porção sub-renal da artéria (n=7); 2) aortas com aterosclerose grave, mas sem aneurismas (n=10); 3) aortas sem aterosclerose ou com grau leve da doença (n=10). Todos os espécimes foram obtidos em necropsias. Usou-se o teste de Wald para comparar os grupos; fixou-se o nível de significância em 5%. Resultados: A íntima era mais fina e a média mais espessa nos casos normais que nos outros grupos (p<0,01). Células positivas para CP foram encontradas em todos os grupos, mais freqüentemente na adventícia, porém sem diferença significativa entre eles (p>0,05). Também se detectou MP em todos os grupos. Este agente predominou no grupo de pacientes com aterosclerose, mas sem aneurisma na íntima e na adventícia; entretanto, as diferenças entre os grupos não foram significativas (p>0,05). Conclusões: Nossos dados sugerem que os agentes enfocados não têm papel importante na patogênese dos AAA.

In the past few decades, increasing interest has also grown around the potential role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. The inflammatory process can modulate the rupture of the plaque (leading to thrombosis) and remodeling [1]. In the abdominal aortic aneurysm, commonly caused by atherosclerosis, the disruption of the extracellular matrix components, especially the elastic tissue, is considered an extremely important mechanism that influences the loss of both normal wall stiffness and dilation. This disruption can be induced by the proteases within the matrix including the elastase [2]; inflammatory cells are the main source of such enzymes. The individual variation in the inflammatory response could be an explanation to the fact that despite atherosclerosis being a common disease and aneurysms a relatively uncommon complication, only cases of atherosclerosis with prominent inflammatory infiltrate would present this pattern of arterial remodeling.

Several studies are trying to address the inflammation causal factors due to the importance given to it, essentially focusing on the research of infectious agents believed to be involved in the atherosclerosis process. Among others [3], the Chlamydia pneumoniae attracted the attention of many authors who believed in the role of the infectious agents in this disease, including the coronary arteries. Regarding the arteries, previous studies carried out in our laboratory have revealed not only the presence of this kind of bacterium, but also the Mycoplasma pneumoniae [4-7]. Such studies have found the Mycoplasma pneumoniae in almost all atheromas (atheromata), but the development of plaque instability is highly believed to be correlated with a large amount of both bacteria. It is well-known that the Mycoplasma pneumoniae co-infection by another bacterium enhances the virulence of both infectious agents [8, 9].

The fact that the mycoplasma requires cholesterol in order to survive because its membrane is built-up by this kind of fat, unique feature among the prokaryotes is according to the findings of these microorganisms in the atherosclerosis process. It has also been previously shown that the thrombosed atherosclerotic plaques are associated with a positive remodeling [10, 11]. The aortic aneurysms can be considered a positive segmental vascular remodeling, and they are followed by thrombosis in ulcerated fatty plaques. In other words, it is a process with similar characteristics to the vulnerable coronary lesions (injuries).

The association between Chlamydia pneumoniae and aortic abdominal aneurysms was investigated by several authors who have demonstrated variable degrees of correlation probably indicating the occasional causal role of this bacterium in such a disease [12-17]. However, morphological studies carried out either by electron microscopy or by immunohistochemistry or by in situ hybridization have only detected the agent without quantifying it. On the other hand, the presence of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae in these lesions (injuries) was les investigated. The data obtained through the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique do not indicate the association of this bacterium with the aortic disease [16, 18].

The aims of the present study are to verify whether these two agents are present in the abdominal aortic aneurysms using another approach for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and if its amount is largest in aneurysms compared to the sites of atherosclerosis without such a complication.


The present study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo School of Medicine Clinics Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.


A transverse section of 19 abdominal aorta atherosclerotic aneurysms located between the origins of the renal arteries and the aortic bifurcation randomly selected among the autopsies carried out at the Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy of the Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo School of Medicine Clinics Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil were included in the study. These autopsies were always performed within a maximum 24-h period, in most cases, within 12 hours after the patients' death. These patients died due to either a ruptured aneurysm (two cases) or a heart ischemic disease. In one patient the heart ischemic disease was associated with rheumatic disease and infectious endocarditis. Just adult arteries were used. Cases were excluded if the abdominal aorta had any other pathological process, such as dissection.

The patients were divided into three control groups. The first one corresponding to the very same abdominal aortae of the cases abovementioned, excluding the aneurysm, once the dilation did not occupy the whole sub-renal portion of the artery (we named this group as "athero-aneu"). Samples of abdominal aortae from 10 patients with severe (acute) atherosclerosis, but without aneurysms, composed the second control group; dissection of the ascending aorta occurred in one patient, but the descending aorta (including the abdominal part) was not compromised by the disease. The third control group was composed by 10 samples of abdominal aortae which were either normal or has mild atherosclerosis (types I or II, according the American Heart Association).


After formaldehyde fixation, all the fragments but the normal ones were decalcified in a saline solution 100d trisodium acid and 250 mL formic acid/L during 4 to 6 days. After that, the fragments were submitted to a routine histological processing and soaked in paraffin. A 3-µm thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin by the Verhoeff method (without counterstain for collagen) to enhance the elastic fibers by limiting the vascular layers and for reactions of immunoperoxidases for Chlamydia pneumoniae detection. To display the Micoplasma pneumoniae, in situ hybridization reactions were performed in sections of 5 µm thick.

The plates stained by hematoxylin and eosin were used for general assessment of the lesions (injuries) and to choose both the section and the area around 1 cm in which the vessel was more preserved and could be better analyzed; the reactions for C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae were prepared in these regions.

Thickness determination of both tunica intima and media - These measures were performed in plates stained by the Verhoeff method using imaging analysis software (Quantimet 500) coupled to a microscope with a 10x objective. This thickness was measured in both the middle and margin of the sections; the measure considered for each vessel was the mean value of these three measures. In some cases, it was taken into consideration that here were atherosclerotic plaques that substantially shift this mean value, and they have not been included in the three measures aforementioned. In these cases, the thickness of this area was also computed as a fourth measure.

Quantification of the elastic fibers - In the same plates stained by the Verhoeff method, and with the same optic system utilized to determine the thickness of the layers, the percentage of the positive area for the elastic fibers by square micrometer was measured in both tunica media and adventitia.

Quantification of Chlamydia pneumoniae - The reactions of the immunoperoxidases were performed for this quantification. The monoclonal antibody for the prevailing protein in external membrane of Chlamydia pneumoniae (Dako, Denmark, clone RR-402) was used without dilution as a primary antibody with an approximately 16-hour incubation period ("overnight") at 4ºC, after antigenic recovery induced by heat in microwave (citrate buffer 0.01M/10 minutes), blockade of the endogenous peroxidase with H2O2 in a 3% TRIS buffer for a two-time period of 10 minutes each, and inhibition of the inespecific staining through incubation with a nonimmune fetal bovine serum diluted in a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) for one hour in a chamber at 37ºC. The secondary antibody was also provided by the DAKO Company, Denmark (E-354). Peroxidase-streptavidin (Amersham, United Kingdom) and diaminobenzidine conjugates (DAB, Dako, United States of America) were used to exposition and Harris hematoxylin for counterstaining.

The number of positive cells for C. pneumoniae by square micrometer was counted in each layer of the artery in a 1-cm length. The area was measured with same software of imaging analysis (Quantimet 500) coupled to a microscope with a 10x objective. Even though an optimization of the coincidence between the microscope imaging and the computer screen had been sought, it was impossible to avoid the brown color, corresponding to the positivity, to be more effusive on the screen. Thus, the observer had to be very restrictive during the count. In any way, this difficulty was similar in all the cases; if there was any error, it was systematic and probably did not influence the comparison between both groups.

Quantification of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae - To perform the in situ hybridization reactions, the sections were heated in water-bath for 45 minutes, then, submitted to a peroxidase blockade similar to the one employed in the immunohistochemistry technique, soaked in a protein blockade without serum (Dako, Denmark) for 15 minutes, and then incubated with 20-µL biotin probe for Mycoplasma pneumoniae for each 80 µL solution with deionized formamid 50%, dextran sulfate, sodium citrate buffer 20x, Denhardt solution, salmon sperm deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid of fungi transfer, poly-A and poly-C, and bidistilled water, at first at 95ºC for 6 minutes and then in humid chamber at 37ºC for about 16 hours ("overnight"). The signal was developed and amplified with the GenPoint system, and DAB was used to exposition (development) with counterstaining with Harry hematoxylin. Once the sections were prepared, they were analyzed with the same software aforementioned, and the percentage of the positive area for Mycoplasma pneumoniae was calculated also in each layer of each artery in a 1-cm length. The same previous considerations apply regarding the dissimilarities between the images observed on the microscope and in the screen.

Statistical analysis

As all the data involved both paired (matched) (areas inside and outside the aneurysms in the cases) and unpaired groups (the other two control groups), the outcome evaluation was planned to be performed using the Wald test. However, as the distribution of the values was abnormal, it was performed a scoring of the cases for each variable; the analysis was then performed considering the position on the scoring as a variable (the complacence to normality was positive) to be tested [19]. The level o significance was set at 5% and the SAS® system was used to perform statistic calculations.


Patients' age, gender and main disease and/or cause of death involved in the study are shown in Table 1. Examples of sections stained with Verhoeff method and submitted to reactions for Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae are shown in Figures 1 to 3.

Fig 1 - Staining for the elastic system present in the abdominal aortae. A- Patient without significant atherosclerosis (normal); B- Patient with atherosclerosis but without aneurysms; C e D- Patient with aneurysm in the area outside (C) or inside it (D). AP - atherosclerotic plaque; T- thrombus. Staining by the Verhoeff method, magnified by 5x objective

Fig. 2 - Immunohistochemistry for Chlamydia Pneumoniae in tunicae intima (A), media (B), and adventitia (C) of an aorta without significant atherosclerosis. D - The same reaction in atherosclerotic plaque inside an aneurysm. The positive cells are staining in brown. The arrows point to some of the cholesterol crystals located inside the plaques. Magnified 40x

Fig. 3 - In situ hybridization for M. pneumoniae in tunicae intima (A), media (B), and adventitia (C) of an aorta without significant atherosclerosis. D - The same reaction in atherosclerotic plaque inside an aneurysm. The positive cells are staining in brown. The arrows point to some of the cholesterol crystals located inside the plaques. Magnified 40x

As the statistical analysis was performed taking into consideration the order (scoring) of each measure, the tables show the average position of each group, besides the medians, averages, and standard deviations. In order to facilitate the visual recognition of the outcomes, the plots concerning to tunica media and intima thicknesses and the percentage of elastic tissue were made considering the averages.

Table 2 and Figure 4 show the thickness of the tunica intima and media of each group. The aneurysmatic regions presented the thickest tunica intima and the thinnest normal aortae. The non-aneurysmatic atherosclerotic lesions (injuries), incases with and without aneurysms, occupied an intermediate position. However, it was a found a significant difference between the normal group and the other three groups (normal vs aneurysms; normal vs athero-aneu; and normal vs atherosclerosis, p < 0.01), but not in these latter ones among themselves (aneurysms vs athero-aneu, p =0.12; aneurysms vs atherosclerosis, p = 0.35; and athero-aneu vs atherosclerosis, p = 0.36). In contrast, the normal aortae had the thickest tunica intima and the aneurysmatic the thinnest ones. Once more, the measure of the non-aneurysmatic atherosclerotic lesions (injuries) has been in-between the ones of the other groups. Regarding this layer, both atherosclerosis groups without aneurysm (athero-aneu and atherosclerosis) were similar to each other (p = 0.89). However, the regions with aneurysm were significantly thinner, and the normal arteries thicker than that of the other groups (all p < 0.01). Figure 5 shows the amount of elastic tissue in the tunicae media and adventitia. The areas with aneurysms had the lowest values compared to the same artery, without aneurysms(p = 0.01), and the aortae of other patients with atherosaclerosis (p < 0.01) or without atherosclerosis (p = 0.04). On the other hand, it was found difference between athero-aneu and atherosclerosis (p = 0.40) suggesting that the disruption of the tissue is related to aneurysms rather than atherosclerosis.

Fig. 4 - Mean thickness of the abdominal aortic layers in aneurysmatic areas (aneurysms) in patients with aneurysms - areas outside the lesion (athero/aneu); in patients with atherosclerosis, but without aneurysms (atherosclerosis); and in patients without significant atherosclerosis (normal)

Fig. 5 - Elastic tissue average percentage in tunicae media and adventitia of the abdominal aorta - aneurysmatic areas (aneurysms), in patients with aneurysms in areas outside the lesion (athero/aneu); in patients with atherosclerosis, but without aneurysms (atherosclerosis); and in patients without significant atherosclerosis (normal)

The outcomes about the number of positive cells for Chlamydia pneumoniae are shown in Table 3 and Figure 6. In all groups, the finding of these bacteria was more frequent in the tunica adventitia; no significant difference was found among them (all groups, p > 0.05).

Fig. 6 - "Box-plot" showing the number of positive cells for Chlamydia Pneumoniae in the layers of tunicae media and adventitia, and in the whole vessel, in abdominal aorta in aneurysmatic areas (1 - aneurysms); in patients with aneurysms but in areas outside the lesion (2 - athero/aneu); in patients with atherosclerosis, but without aneurysms (3 - atherosclerosis); and inpatients without significant atherosclerosis (4 - normal)

Table 4 and Figure 7 show the percentage of the area occupied by the Mycoplasma pneumoniae in each group. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was most prevalent in the group of patients with atherosclerosis but without aneurysm, i.e., either in the tunica intima or in the tunica adventitia, but the differences was not significant (p > 0.05).

Fig. 7 - "box-plot" showing the percentage of the area occupied by the M. pneumoniae in the layers of tunicae intima, media, and adventitia, and in the whole vessel, in abdominal aorta in aneurysmatic areas (1 - aneurysms); in patients with aneurysms but in areas outside the lesion (2 - athero/aneu); in patients with atherosclerosis, but without aneurysms (3 - atherosclerosis); and inpatients without significant atherosclerosis (4 - normal)


Upon trying to get the most complete clinical picture as possible regarding the putative involvement of both Chlamydia pneumoniae and/or Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the pathogenesis of both atherosclerosisand aneurysms of abdominal aorta, we used three types of control: 1) the same abdominal aortae that constituted the study group, not considering the area affected by the aneurysm. This control group was included to reveal occasionally located changes which might explain why a specific area is affected by dilation, but not the rest of the vessel. This group had only 7 cases because 3 aneurysms affected all the abdominal aorta; 2) aortae with severe atherosclerosis without aneurysms. Because only a small percentage of the patients with severe atherosclerosis develop aneurysms, the aim of this comparison was to seek for factors that could distinguish these patients from the majority; 3) aortae without significant atherosclerosis were included as true controls, especially in order to verify the possible presence of bacteria focused in healthy people.

The present study did not aim at evaluating the patients' age and gender. As was expected, the ages of the cases with atherosclerosis (with or without aneurysms) were higher than that one of the normal group. A higher proportion of men among the cases of aneurysm could be expected according to the epidemiologic dada [20], even though in our study, we have had 90%, while in the literature the prevalence is not as high, ranging from 66% to 88% depending on the review [20]. Also we have a relatively high number of women with and without atherosclerosis in control groups.

The outcomes regarding the thickness of the aortic layers were in accordance with the expectation: normal aortae had thinner tunica intima and thicker tunica media, the opposite occurring with the aneurysms. Considering that the atherosclerosis is the built up of lipids and other substances in the tunica intima, it is easy to understand why the three groups of aortic segments with atherosclerosis had the greatest tunica intima. The differences between atherosclerotic lesions (injuries) with and without aneurysms were not significant. On the other hand, the tapering of the tunica media is a well-known secondary effect of the atherosclerosis. The disruption of the elastic tissue which is associated with the establishment of aneurysms turns this characteristic to be particularly profuse. These facts explain why the tunica media was thinner in the aneurysms, intermediate in atherosclerotic areas without them (regardless of the presence of the dilation of the artery) and thicker in the aortae without atherosclerosis.

Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were detected in all groups. Previous researches about Mycoplasma pneumoniae in abdominal aortic aneurysms using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method turned to be negative. Regarding the Chlamydia pneumoniae, the previous findings were controversial: the percentage of the positive cases ranged from 0% to 100% for PCR [21], in situ hybridization, or immunohistochemistry.

Such a variation between the data from different centers and the presence of bacteria in all groups in our study raises concerns whether the reactions could show a false-positive result. It has been suggested that the antibodies against the membrane of the Chlamydia pneumoniae used in the reactions of the immunoperoxidases (just like in Western blot technique which we did not employ) could have a cross-reaction with â hemoglobin chain [22], or heavy chain of immunoglobulin [23], and thus presenting an inespecific outcome. These studies, however, used antibodies prepared by their own authors rather than the commercial antibody used by our group and by the majority of the researchers, even though directed to the same external membrane of the Chlamydia.

The studies which have focused the abdominal aortic aneurysms did not measure comparatively the patients' level of infection. On one hand, as we have described in the aortae, previous researches of our laboratory have shown that even people without atherosclerosis can present some amount of bacteria in coronary arteries. Regarding the arteries, it was shown significant differences between the groups with and without atherosclerosis and between stable and unstable plaques [4-7]. These points strengthen the necessity of a quantitative method to better analyze the role of both Chlamydia and mycoplasma in the diseases.

In the present article, using a quantitative method we did not show any difference between the groups regarding the two types of microorganisms contrary to what have been described by our laboratory concerning to coronary arteries. A possible explanation to this fact could involve the population of the studies. In other articles, only coronary arteries of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) or Chagas disease were enrolled in the control group [4-7], while in the present study, among patients without aortic atherosclerosis enrolled, there was cases of heart transplant, infectious diseases, neoplasia, and rheumatic disease (Table 1); one of the cases of aneurysm also had rheumatic diseases and infectious endocarditis. It is possible that these cases cause or are caused by some kind of immunologic imbalance, which could interfere with the patients' capacity to react to bacteria, we have focused, thus influencing our outcomes. This idea was strengthened by the observation that the patients with Chagas disease present less mycoplasma and Chlamydia in their tissues [24] which would raise yet more the differences between the control populations of both studies.

Some differences observed in the coronary arteries were detected in a number of patients similar to the present study [4]. However, the relatively small size of our sample reduces the statistical power of the comparison, and we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the real difference between both groups had been hidden by this reason.

Other differences have already been described in the atherosclerotic process among the aorta and the coronary arteries besides the evident lack of the role of the bacteria in the process, which contrasts with the previous studies performed in this laboratory. While in the coronary arteries the lipoid striae and the atherosclerotic plaques have the same distribution, in the aortae these two types of atherosclerotic lesions have different sites [25]. The time of appearance and evolution is different: in the aorta, the process begins in childhood and advances very slowly, while in the coronary arteries the lesions begin at puberty [26]. The lipid content of the lesions also varies according to the vascular site, at least in the lipoid striae [27]. Even in the aorta itself, the distribution is not homogenous: the impairment of the abdominal portion is much more severe than that of the thoracic portion. In another article written by our group, we have found the correlation between the intensity of the atherosclerotic lesions and the vascular diameter in the thoracic aorta, but not in the abdominal aorta [28]. In such a case, the differences relative to Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae between the arterial beds can also represent a real distinction between the atherosclerotic processes in both sites. On the whole, our data suggest that the highlighted agents do not seem to have an important role in the pathogenesis of the abdominal aortic aneurysms.


This study was supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP), Brazil, proceeding numbers 99/00322-9 and 01/06917-6. The authors express their gratitude to Adriana Psota, Solange A. Consorti, Joana P. Araújo, Sueli A. P. Salomino, and Nádia V. Sambiase for their support in providing the plates, the immunohistochemistry reactions, and the in situ hybridizations.


1. Faxon DP, Fuster V, Libby P, Beckman JA, Hiatt WR, Thompson RW, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group III: pathophysiology. American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;109(21):2617-25. [MedLine]

2. Shah PK. Inflammation, metalloproteinases, and increased proteolysis: an emerging pathophysiological paradigm in aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 1997;96(7):2115-7. [MedLine]

3. Marques da Silva R, Lingaas PS, Geiran O, Tronstad L, Olsen I. Multiple bacteria in aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1384-9. [MedLine]

4. Higuchi M, Castelli JB, Aiello VD, Palomino S, Reis MM, Sambiase NV, et al. Great amount of C. pneumoniae in ruptured plaque vessel segments at autopsy: a comparative study with stable plaques. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2000;74(2):149-51. [MedLine]

5. Higuchi ML, Sambiase N, Palomino S, Gutierrez P, Demarchi LM, Aiello VD, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33(9):1023-6. [MedLine]

6. Higuchi M de L, Ramires JA. Infectious agents in coronary atheromas: a possible role in the pathogenesis of plaque rupture and acute myocardial infarction. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2002;44(4):217-24. [MedLine]

7. Higuchi M de L, Reis MM, Sambiase NV, Palomino SA, Castelli JB, Gutierrez PS, et al. Coinfection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in ruptured plaques associated with acute myocardial infarction. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2003;81(1):12-22. [MedLine]

8. Stacey A, Bradlow A. Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Mycoplasma pneumoniae co-infection. J Infection. 1999;38(1):41-2.

9. Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1094-156.

10. Bezerra HG, Higuchi ML, Gutierrez PS, Palomino SA, Silvestre JM, Libby P, et al. Atheromas that cause fatal thrombosis are usually large and frequently accompanied by vessel enlargement. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001;10(4):189-96. [MedLine]

11. Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, van Wolferen W, Hillen B, Clarijs RJ, Haudenschild CC, et al. The impact of atherosclerotic arterial remodeling on percentage of luminal stenosis varies widely within the arterial system: a postmortem study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(11):3057-63. [MedLine]

12. Blasi F, Denti F, Erba M, Cosentini R, Raccanelli R, Rinaldi A, et al. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae but not Helicobacter pylori in atherosclerotic plaques of aortic aneurysms. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(11):2766-9. [MedLine]

13. Juvonen J, Juvonen T, Laurila A, Alakarppa H, Lounatmaa K, Surcel HM, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;800:236-8. [MedLine]

14. Lindholt JS, Ostergard L, Henneberg EW, Fasting H, Andersen P. Failure to demonstrate Chlamydia pneumoniae in symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms by a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15(2):161-4. [MedLine]

15. Karlsson L, Gnarpe J, Naas J, Olsson G, Lindholm J, Steen B, et al. Detection of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(6):630-5. [MedLine]

16. Maraha B, Berg H, Scheffer GJ, van der Zee A, Bergmans A, Misere J, et al. Correlation between detection methods of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic tissues. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;39(3):139-43. [MedLine]

17. Porqueddu M, Spirito R, Parolari A, Zanobini M, Pompilio G, Polvani G, et al. Lack of association between serum immunoreactivity and Chlamydia pneumoniae detection in the human aortic wall. Circulation. 2002;106(21):2647-8. [MedLine]

18. Blasi F, Boman J, Esposito G, Melissano G, Chiesa R, Cosentini R, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA detection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells is predictive of vascular infection. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(6):2074-6. [MedLine]

19. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York:John Wiley & Sons;1990. p.461.

20. Harthun NL, Cheanvechai V, Graham LM, Freischlag JA, Gahtan V. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and repair outcomes on the basis of patient sex: should the timing of intervention be the same? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(2):325-8. [MedLine]

21. Apfalter P, Blasi F, Boman J, Gaydos CA, Kundi M, Maass M, et al. Multicenter comparison trial of DNA extraction methods and PCR assays for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in endarterectomy specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(2):519-24. [MedLine]

22. Vammen S, Vorum H, Ostergaard L, Henneberg EW, Lindholt JS. Immunoblotting analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms using antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae recombinant MOMP. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24(1):81-5. [MedLine]

23. Lindholt JS, Stovring J, Ostergaard L, Urbonavicius S, Henneberg EW, Honore B, et al. Serum antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae outer membrane protein cross-react with the heavy chain of immunoglobulin in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2004;109(17):2097-102. [MedLine]

24. Higuchi ML. Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase as a new therapeutic tool in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases: possible action against mycoplasma and chlamydia. Med Hypotheses. 2004;63:616-23. [MedLine]

25. McGill HC Jr. General findings of the International Project of Atherosclerosis. Lab Invest. 1968;18(5):498-502. [MedLine]

26. McGill HC Jr. Fatty streaks in the coronary arteries and aorta. Lab Invest. 1968;18(5):560-4. [MedLine]

27. Panganamala RV, Geer JC, Sharma HM, Cornwell DG. The gross and histologic appearance and the lipid composition of normal intima and lesions from human coronary arteries and aorta. Atherosclerosis. 1974;20(1):93-104. [MedLine]

28. Benvenuti LA, Onishi RY, Gutierrez PS, Higuchi ML. Different patterns of atherosclerotic remodeling in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Clinics. 2005;60(5):355-60. [MedLine]

CCBY All scientific articles published at are licensed under a Creative Commons license


All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY