Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

26

Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

One-stage management of infected sternotomy wounds using bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flap

João de Deus e BritoI; Claudio Roberto AssumpçãoII; Henrique MuradIII; Antonio de Pádua JazbikIV; Mauro Paes Leme de SáV; Eduardo Sergio BastosV; Rubens Giambroni FilhoV; Renato Souza e SilvaVI

DOI: 10.1590/S0102-76382009000100011

INTRODUCTION

Although relatively uncommon and with an incidence around 0.4% to 5% [1], the infected sternal wound dehiscence presents significant rate of mortality, morbidity and hospital costs. Mortality can vary from 6% to 70% [2].

Different techniques have been used to treat this serious complication. Among the methods of maneuver are included resutures and continuous irrigation [3,4], two-stage treatment and dead space obliteration using muscle flaps (rotated or translated using vascular pedicles, including the major pectoralis, rectus abdominis and the large dorsal) [3 -9].

Due to the importance of this type of complication, this issue has attracted cardiovascular and plastic surgeons, for over forty years [1-3,10-20]. In our institution, since 1986, we began to treat - consecutively - the sternal wound infection (with debridement, wide drainage and immediate closure) with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flap, whose initial results were published in 1993 [21]. This technique has been described, in the same way, by several authors [22.23], even in children previously undergone treatment of congenital heart disease [24,25].

The aim of this study is to report our experience in this current series of 13 non-selected patients who had undergone treatment with the standard protocol initiated in 1986. This protocol aims at early diagnosis and cure of the infection and functional and aesthetic recovering, providing the patients capacity for normal activity.


METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2007, at Clementino Fraga Filho Hospital-FM-UFRJ and Aloysio de Castro State Institute of Cardiology, RJ, among 1972 heart surgeries, 13 (0.67%) patients presented deep sternal wound infection and dehiscence. All patients with this complication were treated by the same protocol. Most patients had undergone CABG, including left internal mammary artery in all patients (11), surgery for valve replacement (one), and a child had undergone total correction of atrioventricularis communis defect.

Twelve patients had been previously undergone single sternotomy and one patient two sternotomies. There was male predominance, with only five female patients. The age ranged between two months and 67 years. The risk factors were: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term ventilation in ventilatory assistance, long duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, diabetes mellitus, prior surgery and systemic infection.

From a clinical point of view, the arising of characteristic signals on the wound, such as redness, hyperemia, purulent collection and mostly sternal instability, were sufficient to induce the diagnosis of infection or sternal dehiscence. The CT and chest radiography were of great value in the diagnosis of deep sternal wound infection, however, the continuous and daily search of this patient's complication in the early postoperative period is crucial.

This study was submitted and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State Institute of Cardiology at the meeting on November 12, 2008 under number 2008/22.

Surgical technique

Once confirmed the diagnosis of sternal infection (Figure 1), we performed early intervention that consisted of incision and excision of 0.5 cm of each wound edge, removal of steel wires, rigorous debridement of necrotic tissue, until occurrence of tissue bleeding. Samples of mediastinal fluid and bone tissue for culture and antibiogram were collected. Careful and extensive cleaning of the wound was performed using saline solution at 37º degrees Celsius, in a procedure similar to that practiced in management of exposed wounds (Figure 2).


Fig. 1- Total dehiscence of the sternal wound after CABG.


Fig. 2 - Sternal wound after total debridement and major pectoralis bilateral dissection with anterior mediastinal drain



We began dissection and elevation of the left pectoralis major muscle and corresponding subcutaneous flap through diathermy, from the median line along the costal grid, up to two thirds of the anterior chest wall, preserving intact the humeral insertion, thoracoacromial vascular bundle and pectoralis minor muscle. At inferior plane, the pectoralis major muscle was raised - including the anterior rectus fascia - and down up to the xiphoid process. The upper segment of the anterior rectum has been raised with the pectoralis major muscle, while the abdominal rectus was not involved in the dissection. The hemostasis of intercostal perforating arterial branches was accurately performed.

The dissection was performed - similarly to the right pectoralis major muscle. A drain tube (Number 34) was placed in the anterior mediastinum. A catheter was installed in the skin of the upper edge of the sternal wound by counter-opening for instillation of saline solution with antibiotics, followed by osteosynthesis using steel wire (number 5). In patients with fracture or asymmetry of the sternum incision, osteosynthesis was performed using the Robiscek technique. Two suction drains were placed below the muscular plane upon the costal grid for drainage of the large area of detachment of the musculoaponeurotic layer (Figure 3).


Fig. 3- Costal grid with sternal resuture and drains positioned upon the costal grid. Muscle-cutaneous flap of the major pectoralis bilaterally withdrawn



Approximation of the major pectoralis and fascia was performed, including part of the anterior rectum, using monofilament number 2 (polyglycolic acid). Sutures were performed 2 cm from the muscle-aponeurotic edge with interrupted sutures and without any tension. The skin and the major pectoralis muscle-cutaneous flap were sutured, in interrupted sutures using 00 mononylon thread. It is of great value the clinical support of associated diseases and the administration of antibiotics, as the antibiogram sensitivity.

Postoperative care

Continuous irrigation of 100 ml per hour for 24 h is performed. If at the end of 48 hours the leaving of liquid presents clear without fibrin, clot or debris, the irrigation flow is reduced to 75 or 50 ml and finished within a week. If after finishing of irrigation there is persistence of drainage, the drains will continue to be placed until all liquid had left. Patients continue to receive appropriate intravenous therapy while hospitalized and until the third week in case of need for vancomycin. As the majority of infections produced by Staphylococcus species, the antibiotic of choice was the vancomycin and up to the third week.

For irrigation of the topic solution, we used 1 g/1000 ml cefazolin or vancomycin or gentamicin as the antibiogram and sensitivity. The wound should be cleaned twice daily using chlorhexidine, and the monofilament stitch of the suture of skin and subcutaneous cell tissue should remain for three weeks.


RESULTS

The mean time of surgery was 95 minutes. The volume replacement with concentrated red blood cells was not significant. All patients were referred for intensive care unit and 12 were extubated in the first 12 or 24 hours. The hospital discharge occurred on average at the 25th postoperative day. All patients underwent surgery during the early postoperative period of the first surgery and only one patient underwent surgery after three months presenting chronic infection (type III) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. The surgery was successfully performed and the patient was discharged from hospital on the 18th postoperative day. The predominant bacteria in this series was of Staphylococcus species (eight), followed by Streptococcus epidermitis (two), and a case of Serratia marcescens and two negative cases. The drains were removed only when the drainage flow reached the limit zero. There was one (7.6%) death during hospitalization, on the 16th day of the intervention on the sternal wound due to systemic infection. There was suture dehiscence after repair. Four patients required surgical reintervention to treat residual seroma or localized infection.

At the 12th day of surgical repair of the sternal wound an obese patient with diabetes mellitus presented abundant secretion, on which the Serratia marcescens bacteria grew. The patient undergone then a second intervention, on which stability of the sternum and pectoralis major muscle was found - used in the wound repair. New debridement and drainage were performed. The patient evolved well and was discharged from hospital on the 20th day after the second intervention.

The patients continued to receive appropriate intravenous therapy. As the majority of infections produced by species of staphylococcus, the antibiotic of choice was vancomycin, which was extended until the third week. For irrigation of the topical solution was used 1g/1000ml cefazolin or vancomycin or gentamicin as the antibiogram sensitivity.

The aesthetic and functional recovery of this procedure have been excellent. However, one patient complained of mild limitation of movements of shoulders, which stopped at the end of three months of physiotherapy.


DISCUSSION

To treat mediastinitis and sternum dehiscence, since the 80's, many surgeons began to perform transposition of the pectoralis major flaps, anterior rectus or epiplon with vascular pedicle for obliteration of dead space [3-9]. In 1993, we presented our experience started in 1986, in the treatment of infected sternotomy on which we used a new approach - single stage - using the pectoralis major muscle and the corresponding subcutaneous flap, taken bilaterally to the midline. We have used this procedure routinely and systematically [21.26]. Other reports have been published with the same technique and with good results [22-25]. Unlike the techniques of muscle flaps - translated or rotated with vascular pedicles [11-12] - the technique of advancement of the major pectoralis - bilaterally - is efficient, requires no additional incision and offers full aesthetic and functional recovery of the anterior chest. There are several classifications of sternal infection; we prefer the classification reported by Pairolero et al. [6], who subdivide the infection into three types:

  • Type I - occurs within the first week of the sternotomy. It is characterized by serosanguineous drainage without cellulitis and osteomyelitis.
  • Type II - occurs between the second and fourth week of sternotomy and is always accompanied by purulent secretion, cellulitis, and often there is osteomyelitis.
  • Type III - the infection is late and may arise over months or years after sternotomy. Such infections are chronic, with localized cellulitis, osteomyelitis and chondritis, and presence of mediastinitis is rare.


  • The patients in our series were of type I and II and only one patient was classified as type III, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. The surgery was successfully performed this patient was discharged from hospital on the 18th postoperative day. In addition to the predominant bacteria in hospital infections such as species of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus epidermitis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other, we had a case with presence of Serratia marcescens bacteria. This bacteria has been found recently as the germs responsible for the nosocomial infection [23.27].

    In our experience, early diagnosis and intervention contributed significantly to reduce the extent of tissue necrosis. This opinion is shared by other authors [20]. Most surgeons who uses this technique prefers a single stage approach of this complication [11,12, 21-23,28] and, to a lesser extent, in two stages [20]. In the last ten years, the use of the pectoralis major muscle has contributed to the high decrease in the 30-days operative mortality rate about 7.9% to 9.5% [23.26]. Or in some reports with no hospital 30-days hospital mortality [4.20].

    In addition to other advantages, this procedure can be used in patients who underwent CABG using internal thoracic artery [20-22,23]. It is, however, contraindicated in case of hemodynamic instability and surgical site infection, as reported previously [21]. The risk factors in mediastinitis have been reported frequently, for which we must be careful and make the necessary prevention [17-19].

    The use of mediastinum drainage under high vacuum pressure with polyurethane foam have been promising in the treatment of primary sternal infection after median sternotomy [16]. This procedure was considered effective according to a multicenter study involving 79 institutions in Germany with 90,000 patients who underwent heart surgery in 2007 on which 2000 (0.45%) cases of mediastinitis were found [29]. However, this procedure can only be used in patients with intact pleura and it is not free from complications such as pleural rupture and fall of cardiac output [15].


    CONCLUSIONS

    In the sternal wound infection involving deep planes or with post-sternotomy dehiscence, we recommend single stage management, using bilaterally the pectoralis major muscle and myocutaneous flap sutured to the midline. This behavior is efficient and can reduce the morbidity, restoring the aesthetics and anatomy of the anterior region of the chest.


    REFERENCES

    1. Sarr MG, Gott VL, Townsend TR. Mediastinal infection after cardiac surgery.1984. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;38(4):415-23. [MedLine]

    2. Cheung EH, Craver JM, Jones EL, Murphy DA, Hatcher CR Jr, Guyton RA. Mediastinitis after cardiac valve operations. Impact upon survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;90(4):517-22. [MedLine]

    3. Shumacker HB Jr, Mandelbaum I. Continuous antibiotic irrigation in the treatment of infection. Arch Surg. 1963;86:384-7. [MedLine]

    4. Molina JE, Nelson EC, Smith RR. Treatment of postoperative sternal dehiscence with mediastinitis: twenty-four-year use of single method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132(4):782-7. [MedLine]

    5. Jurkiewicz MJ, Bostwick J 3rd, Hester TR, Bishop JB, Craver J. Infected median sternotomy wound. Successful treatment by muscle flaps. Ann Surg. 1980;191(6):738-44. [MedLine]

    6. Pairolero PC, Arnold PG, Harris JB. Long-term results of pectoralis major muscle transposition for infected sternotomy wounds. Ann Surg. 1991;213(6):583-9.

    7. Herrera HR, Ginsburg ME. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and omental transposition for closure of infected median sternotomy wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70(4):465-70. [MedLine]

    8. Nahai F, Rand RP, Hester TR, Bostwick J 3rd, Jurkiewicz MJ. Primary treatment of the infected sternotomy wound with muscle flaps: a review of 211 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84(3):434-41. [MedLine]

    9. Pairolero PC, Arnold PG. Thoracic wall defects: surgical management of 205 consecutive patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61(7):557-63. [MedLine]

    10. Jones G, Jurkiewicz MJ, Bostwick J, Wood R, Bried JT, Culbertson J, et al. Management of the infected median sternotomy wound with muscle flaps. The Emory 20-year experience. Ann Surg. 1997;225(6):766-8.

    11. Jeevanandam V, Smith CR, Rose EA, Malm JR, Hugo NE. Single-stage management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99(2):256-62.

    12. Hugo NE, Sultan MR, Ascherman JA, Patsis MC, Smith CR, Rose EA. Single-stage management of 74 consecutive sternal wound complications with pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(7):1433-41. [MedLine]

    13. Brandt C, Alvarez JM. First-line treatment of deep sternal infection by a plastic surgical approach: superior results compared with conventional cardiac surgical orthodoxy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2231-7. [MedLine]

    14. Marques RL, Arnoni AS, Dinkhuysen JJ, Addulmassih Neto C, Chaccur P, Souza LCB, et al. Manuseio da deiscência do esterno no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 1990;5(2):125-36. View article

    15. Abu-Omar Y, Naik MJ, Catarino PA, Ratnatunga C. Right ventricular rupture during use of high-pressure suction drainage in the management of poststernotomy mediastinitis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(3):974. [MedLine]

    16. Catarino PA, Chamberlain MH, Wright NC, Black E, Campbell K, Robson D, et al. High-pressure suction drainage via a polyurethane foam in the management poststernotomy mediastinitis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(6):1891-5. [MedLine]

    17. Fatureto MC, Neves Junior MA, Santana TC. Mediastinite aguda. Análise retrospectiva de 21 casos. J Bras Pneumol. 2005;31(4):307-11.

    18. Sampaio DT, Alves JCR, Silva AF, Lobo Jr NC, Simões D, Faria W, et al. Mediastinite em cirurgia cardíaca: tratamento com epiploon. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2000;15(1):23-31. View article

    19. Sousa VC, Freire AMN, Tavares NJ. Mediastinite pósesternotomia longitudinal para cirurgia cardíaca: 10 anos de análise. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2002;17(3):266-70.

    20. Wong CH, Senewiratne S, Garlick B, Mullany D. Two-stage management of esternal wound infection using bilateral pectoralis major advancement flap. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(1):148-52. [MedLine]

    21. Brito JD, Jazbik AP, Murad H, Giambroni F. Intervenção precoce e reconstrução por deslizamento músculo-cutâneo do peitoral maior, na mediastinite pós-cirurgia cardíaca. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1993;Supl. 49. [MedLine]

    22. Ascherman JA, Hugo NE, Sultan MR, Patsis MC, Smith CR, Rose EA. Single-stage treatment of sternal wound complications in heart transplant recipients in whom pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps were used. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110(4 Pt 1):1030-6. [MedLine]

    23. Ascherman JA, Patel SM, Malhotra SM, Smith CR. Management of sternal wound with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps in 114 consecutively treated patients: refinements in technique and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(3):676-83. [MedLine]

    24. Kollar A, Drinkwater DC Jr. Bilateral pectoral myocutaneous advancement flaps and anatomic sternal wound reconstruction in cyanotic infants with mediastinitis. J Card Surg. 2003;18(3):245-52. [MedLine]

    25. Erez E, Katz M, Sharoni E, Katz Y, Leviav A, Vidne BA, et al. Pectoralis major muscle flap for deep sternal wound infection in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(2):572-7. [MedLine]

    26. Brito JD, Murad H, Jazbik AP, Giambroni R. Deiscência do esterno após cirurgia cardíaca. Reconstituição por deslizamento músculo-cutâneo do peitoral maior: uma nova abordagem técnica. Associação Latino-Americana de Academias Nacionales de Medicina. Jornada Comemorativa do 170º Aniversário da Academia Nacional de Medicina. Sessão de Temas Livres sobre Enfermidades Cardiovasculares 1999; 29 e 30 de junho.

    27. Vasconcelos FF, Menezes EA, Cunha FA, Salviano MNC, Ângelo MRF, Oliveira IRN. Perfil de resistência da bactéria da espécie Serratia marcescens isolada de infecções hospitalares no Hospital Geral de Fortaleza (H.G.F). RBAC. 2006;38(1):35-7.

    28. Ohye RG, Maniker RB, Graves HL, Devaney EJ, Bove EL. Primary closure for postoperative mediastinitis in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;128(3):480-6.

    29. Schimmer C, Sommer SP, Bensch M, Leyh R. Primary treatment of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: a survey of German heart surgery centers. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(6):708-11. [MedLine]

    Article receive on Wednesday, August 6, 2008

    CCBY All scientific articles published at bjcvs.org are licensed under a Creative Commons license

    Indexes

    All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY