RBCCV FacebookTwitterBlogBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular

ISSN (On-line): 1678-9741
ISSN (print): 0102-7638
Impact Factor: 0.809
Forgot my login or password
Advanced Search

Volume 32 Number 2, March - April, 2017

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0007

Effects of Low-Dose Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide on Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Yesheng PanI; ZhiGang LuI; Jingyu HangI; Shixin MaI; Jian MaI; Meng WeiI

IMD. Heart Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, P.R. China

This study was carried out at the Heart Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, P.R. China.

Correspondence To:
Meng Wei
600 Yishang Road
Shanghai 200233, China
E-mail: mrweei_6h@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The mortality due to cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is high even in patients with early revascularization. Infusion of low dose recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) at the time of AMI is well tolerated and could improve cardiac function.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of rhBNP in AMI patients revascularized by emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who developed cardiogenic shock.
METHODS: A total of 48 patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock and whose hemodynamic status was improved following emergency PCI were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to rhBNP (n=25) and control (n=23) groups. In addition to standard therapy, study group individuals received rhBNP by continuous infusion at 0.005 µg kg−1 min−1 for 72 hours.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, medications, and peak of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were similar between both groups. rhBNP treatment resulted in consistently improved pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) compared to the control group. Respectively, 7 and 9 patients died in experimental and control groups. No drug-related serious adverse events occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: When added to standard care in stable patients with cardiogenic shock complicating anterior STEMI, low dose rhBNP improves PCWP and is well tolerated.

Keywords Myocardial Infarction. Shock, Cardiogenic. Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ACEI = Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

AMI = Acute myocardial infarction

ANOVA = Analysis of variance

ANP = Atrial natriuretic peptide

ARB = Angiotensin receptor blockers

ASCEND-HF = Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide and Decompensated Heart Failure

BNP = B type natriuretic peptide

CABG = Coronary artery bypass graft surgery

cGMP = Cyclic guanosine monophosphate

CI = Cardiac index

cTnI = Cardiac troponin I

ECG = Eletrocardiograma

eGFR = Estimate glomerular filtration rate

FDA = U. S. Food and Drug Administration

IABP = Intra-aortic balloon pump

LMWH = Low-molecular-weight heparin

LVADs = Left ventricular assist devices

LVEF = Left ventricular ejection fraction

PCI = Percutaneous coronary intervention

MSOF = Multiple systemic organ failure

NT-proBNP = N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide

PCWP = Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure

RAP = Right atrial pressure

rhBNP = Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide

SBP = Systolic blood pressure

SOAP = Sepsis occurrence in acutely ill patients

SPSS = Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

STEMI = ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

VMAC = Vasodilation in the Management of Acute Congestive Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock complicates 6-10% of all ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases and remains a leading cause of death, with hospital mortality rates approaching 50%[1]. Emergency revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has been shown to improve long-term survival of these patients[2-4]. Despite this progress, cardiogenic shock continues to be associated with a high short-term mortality rate[5]. Vasopressors and inotropes are used to improve the hemodynamic status, but the information about comparative effective outcomes is limited; indeed, some of them could induce decreased survival rate that may be associated with the deleterious cellular effects of these drugs[6,7].

B type natriuretic peptide (BNP), released due to altered chamber loading and myocyte stretch, has been detected in acute myocardial infarction (AMI)[8,9]. BNP can act via the natriuretic peptide receptor A/guanylyl cyclase/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling pathway, maintaining cardio-renal homeostasis through diuresis, natriuresis, vasodilation, and inhibition of aldosterone synthesis and renin secretion under physiological and pathological conditions[10]. Interestingly, exogenous BNP infusion may result in coronary vasodilatation with reduced myocardial oxygen consumption[11], enhanced myocardial relaxation[12], suppressed synthesis and release of aldosterone[13], induced vascular regeneration[14], delayed adrenergic activation and inhibited cardiac fibroblast collagen synthesis[15-17].

rhBNP (Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide) was approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of acute decompensated heart failure in 2001. Recently, a small study showed that rhBNP, given soon after AMI, induces a trend towards favorable ventricular remodeling, but blood pressure was lower with rhBNP over the first 8-12 hours of infusion without clinically significant hypotension[18]. Low-dose rhBNP administration could avoid hypotension in patients with cardio-renal disease. Indeed, Brunner-La Rocca et al.[15] have reported that in humans withheart failure, low-dose rhBNP suppresses the adrenergic outflow without hypotension. Chen et al.[13] reported that 72 hours of infusion of low-dose rhBNP at the time of anterior AMI is well tolerated, and may suppress aldosterone and preserve ventricular function and structure in patients with anterior AMI.

There are currently no reports on low-dose rhBNP administration in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating STEMI after successful early revascularization. We proposed a pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low dose rhBNP in the setting of STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock. This study was designed to evaluate the hemodynamic, neuro-hormonal, and renal effects of rhBNP given as a 72-hour infusion to AMI patients revascularized by emergency PCI who developed cardiogenic shock, but were stable after appropriate medical intervention.

 

METHODS

Patients

The study group included patients admitted to Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, China, with cardiogenic shock complicating a first anterior AMI from March 2009 to March 2013. Patients were eligible for the trial if they presented with: (1) anterior STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock; (2) successful early revascularization performed with stable hemodynamic status [systolic blood pressure< 90 mmHg] in the 1st hour post-intervention. Anterior STEMI was diagnosed by the following criteria: prolonged chest pain >30 minutes; positive troponin I; ST-segment elevation 2 mv in two or more adjacent anterior precordial leads. A patient was considered to be in cardiogenic shock if: (1) systolic blood pressure was less than 90 mmHg for more than 30 minutes or catecholamine infusion was required to maintain a systolic pressure above 90 mmHg; (2) clinical signs of pulmonary congestion were present; or (3) there was evidence of impaired end organ perfusion. The diagnosis of impaired end organ perfusion required at least one of the following: altered mental status; cold, clammy skin and extremities; oliguria with urine output of less than 30 ml per hour; serum lactate level higher than 2.0 mmol per liter. All patients got successful revascularization (emergency PCI, TIMI grade 3 flow) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support within 24h of onset of chest pain, were enrolled, and sent to Coronary Care Unit for hemodynamic monitoring.

Exclusion criteria were: SBP < 90 mmHg within first hour post-intervention although 12 mg/kg × min dopamine and 1:1 IABP supporting; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) < 18 mmHg; acute inferior, posterior and right ventricle myocardial infarction; previous history of myocardial infarction; previous eletrocardiograma (ECG) suggesting an old myocardial infarction; previous history of chronic heart failure or decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation; other hemodynamically significant valvular or congenital heart diseases; estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2; previous known intolerance history to rhBNP.

This was a randomized (sealed enveloped), open-label, parallel group study. Patients were assigned to rhBNP or control group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints were absolute changes in PCWP from baseline to 72 hours after randomization compared to the control group. Secondary endpoints included comparisons between rhBNP and control groups of the following hemodynamic and clinical effects: cardiac index, in hospital mortality, 72 hours urine output, and safety profile (renal function, hypotension). The trial protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai 6th People's Hospital. Documented informed consent was obtained from each patient or his/her guardian.

Protocol

Each patient was monitored hemodynamically using a pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter (bedside chest X-ray was done to check its position). Arterial blood pressure was measured with IABP. Baseline heart rate, blood pressure, right atrial pressure (RAP), PCWP and cardiac index (CI) were recorded three times within a 5 minutes period using the bedside patient monitor. Measurements were carried out by another research team member blinded to treatment allocation. Additional measurements were performed 15 min and then 3, 24, 48 and 72h after starting drug administration. Echocardiography was performed immediately after operation and read in random order with no patient identifiers.

All the patients were given dopamine (3-12 mg/kg × min) after diagnosis of cardiogenic shock, at dosage adjusted to achieve a satisfactory blood pressure (SBP < 90 mmHg). Patients with stable blood pressure (SBP < 90 mmHg) within 1 hour post-intervention were enrolled and randomized. In the rhBNP group, rhBNP treatment was initiated after randomization for 72 hours with a continuous infusion of 0.005 mg kg-1min-1 without a loading dose. The infusion dosage was decreased to 0.003 mg kg-1min–1 if SBP < 85 mmHg more than 20 minutes despite dopamine titration. If symptomatic hypotension or systolic blood pressure < 75 mmHg occurred, rhBNP infusion was interrupted for 30-60 minutes and the dosage of dopamine increased. rhBNP treatment would restart at 0.003 mg kg-1min-1when the dose-limiting event had resolved. Infusion of rhBNP was discontinued for recurrent symptomatic hypotension; sustained hypotension despite rhBNP dosage decrease to 0.003 mg kg-1min-1or dopamine dosage increase to more than 12 mg kg–1min–1.

In addition to standard medical treatment, dobutamine and norepinephrine were permitted for intractable hypotension and pump failure based on investigator's clinical judgment. Statin, aspirin and clopidogrel were given before emergency PCI. IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (Tirofiban) was administered during the procedure and next 24 hours according to the physician's judgment. Enoxaparin was given from 6 to 72 hours after emergency PCI. Low dose of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as well as beta-blocker therapy were started 24h after randomization if patients tolerated. Blood for measurement of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, cGMP and creatinine levels was drawn before the initiation of IV rhBNP, then at 72 hours and 1 week after randomization.

Statistical Analysis

We postulated an expected change of PCWP as –3.8 mmHg from Vasodilation in the Management of Acute Congestive Heart Failure (VMAC) study[19]. We calculated that a sample size of 21 patients would be needed in each group for a statistical power of 80% at significance level of 0.05 (with a two-sided t-test).

Data were statistically processed and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 software package. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean±standard deviation for continuous data and as percentages for categorical data. Analyses of continuous data were performed by two-sample t-test and categorical data by Chi-Square test. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the differences among groups after treatment. The changes in renal function from baseline to after drug administration were analyzed by paired t-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were screened, of whom 17 were excluded because of hypotension (n=8), death before randomization (n=3), PCWP < 18 mmHg (n=3), eGFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (n=2) or significant mitral valve regurgitation (n=1).

Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of patients, which were similar between both groups. Indeed, peak cTnI, time to PCI, PCWP, CI and LVEF were comparable between the two groups at baseline.

 


Table 1 - Click to enlarge

 

Table 2 shows the clinical management in the hospital. All the patients underwent successful PCI and IABP support. Rates of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation were similar for both of them. Standard medical therapy was used [statin, aspirin, clopidogrel, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)] unless contraindicated. ACEI/ARB and beta-blockers were used if tolerated and titrated gradually. Medical treatments in both groups were similar; no significant differences were observed in average dopamine dosage as well as dobutamine and epinephrine use between both groups.

 


Table 2 - Click to enlarge

 

A total of 16 patients died in hospital. In the rhBNP group, 5 patients died within 72h of randomization [pump failure (n=4); multiple systemic organ failure – MSOF - (n=1)], and 1 patient died at each day 4 (cardiac rupture) and 10 (pump failure) after randomization. In the control group, 8 patients died within 72h after randomization [pump failure (n=5); MSOF (n=2); ventricular fibrillation (n=1) and 1 died at day 6 (pump failure). These findings indicated that there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (28.0 vs. 39.1%; P=0.305). No re-infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents were observed in either group.

Hemodynamic characteristics at 3 and 72h after randomization were analyzed in live patients (Table 3). After rhBNP infusion, PCWP and RAP were significantly decreased compared to the control group; cardiac index showed increasing trend in the rhBNP group, but the differences were not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were obtained for heart rate, SBP and mean blood pressure between both groups. The dose of rhBNP was reduced to 0.003 mg kg–1min–1 in 3 patients because of asymptomatic hypotension. In 2 patients of the study group, rhBNP infusion was discontinued for symptomatic hypotension, which resolved with no clinical consequences after infusion was stopped. The 72h urine volume after randomization showed no statistically significant difference between these two groups (rhBNP group, 2293 ml/d; control group, 2053 ml/d; P=0.11).

 


Table 3 - Click to enlarge

 

As shown in Table 4, plasma BNP levels increased from baseline after rhBNP infusion, and decreased when the infusion was stopped. cGMP, a secondary messenger of BNP, increased in the rhBNP group compared to control patients. NT-proBNP and eGFR levels were not statistically different between the two groups. In addition, no statistically significant difference was observed in eGFR after rhBNP infusion (68.3±25.2 vs. 64.8±19.7 P=0.401).

 


Table 4 - Click to enlarge

 

DISCUSSION

Animal and clinical studies have shown that BNP infusion limits infarct size, improves cardiac remodeling and protects cardiomyocytes[15,17,20-22]. Recently, a large multicenter clinical trial using atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) at the time of myocardial reperfusion with AMI was reported that ANP (carparitide) could reduce infarct size, improve ejection fraction and decrease the rate of new-onset heart failure[23]. Meta-analysis suggested that ANP/BNP infusion might be effective in protecting left ventricular function in patients with AMI[24]. Thus natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP) seem to be logical adjuncts to standard care for the treatment of AMI. Additionally, BNP has proven effects on acute decompensated heart failure, and should not decrease blood pressure at low dose[13,15]. Therefore, we hypothesized that BNP would be safe and effective for the treatment of STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock. In this study, 48 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating anterior STEMI, successful emergency PCI, and stable hemodynamic status post intervention were enrolled. The major findings of this study are: (1) in comparison with controls, administration of low-dose rhBNP for 72 hours is associated with PCWP reduction; (2) low dose rhBNP treatment is unlikely to be limited by hypotension in this clinical setting; (3) low dose rhBNP does not significantly affect the renal function. Patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock can benefit from the hemodynamic effects of rhBNP. On the other hand, the long-term benefits of remodeling inhibition and cardio-protection need to be confirmed by further studies. Mortality in this study was lower than what reported for the SHOCK trial[3]. In this work, patients who remained unstable after emergency PCI were excluded,which may explain the discrepancy.

In the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for STEMI, emergency revascularization by PCI or CABG for the cardiogenic shock complicating AMI is given a class IB recommendation[25,26]. In our hospital, emergency PCI is the first choice for these patients. IABP was the most widely used form of mechanical hemodynamic support in this clinical setting at the time of the present trial. In the current U.S. and European guidelines, IABP in the treatment of cardiogenic shock is still given IIa and IIb recommendations, respectively, although recent clinical trials showed IABP use does not significantly reduce the 30-day mortality rate in these patients[25-28]. Mechanical left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used in cardiogenic shock patients not responding to standard therapy, but evidence regarding their benefits is limited. In this study, all patients were submitted to emergency PCI and IABP support, and no LVADs were used. The Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) II study was published during the early phase of this trial, with a subgroup analysis showing that dopamine, as compared with norepinephrine, was associated with increased mortality rate at 28 days in patients with cardiogenic shock[29]. However, dopamine is still given a IIa recommendation for AMI patients with CS in the current European Society of Cardiology STEMI guideline[26]. Here, norepinephrine and dobutamine were permitted for intractable hypotension and pump failure. All study patients were treated by the same medical team, to limit biases.

The effect of rhBNP on renal function is controversial. A meta-analysis showed that standard rhBNP dose (0.01 mg kg–1min–1) might be detrimental to renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure[30]; meanwhile, the multicenter randomized control trial Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide and Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) confirmed its renal safety[31]. Recently, a small study reported that low-dose rhBNP improves renal function in heart failure patients following AMI[32]. We demonstrated herein that renal function before and after treatment was similar between both groups.

BNP is a biologically active hormone affecting diuresis and natriuresis. However, increased urine output with physiological and common pharmacological doses of rhBNP has been proven only in normal individuals. The ASCEND-HF trial[33] showed no evidence that nesiritide increases urine output in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Here, we found no evidence that rhBNP increases urine output in the cardiogenic shock patients assessed.

Some small scale clinical trials suggested rhBNP infusion might protect left ventricular function in patients with AMI, but there is no randomized clinical trial which with large sample on these patients[24]. Based on our results, further clinical trial could be planned on rhBNP treatment for AMI patients with or without cardiogenic shock.

 

CONCLUSION

When added to standard care in stable patients with cardiogenic shock complicating anterior STEMI, low dose of rhBNP improves PCWP and is well tolerated.

 

LIMITATION

This was a small open control randomized pilot study. There was no clinical data for PCWP changes after 72h infusion of low dose rhBNP, so we postulated an expected PCWP change of –3.8 mmHg as shown in the VMAC study, which was designed with 3 hours rhBNP infusion at 0.01 mg kg–1min–1 after randomization. Further adequately powered trials are needed to test the short and long-term benefits of rhBNP infusion in this clinical setting.

 

ACKOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Nicole Shan for expert statistical assistance, as well as the co-investigators and staff at their respective institutions.


REFERENCES

1. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation. 2009;119(9):1211-9. [MedLine]

2. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):625-34. [MedLine]

3. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, Moscucci M, Saucedo J, Hosat S, et al. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(9):828-37. [MedLine]

4. Spence N, Abbott JD. Coronary revascularization in cardiogenic shock. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016;18(1):1. [MedLine]

5. Carnendran L, Abboud R, Sleeper LA, Gurunathan R, Webb JG, Menon V, et al. Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? Eur Heart J. 2001;22(6):472-8. [MedLine]

6. Thackray S, Easthaugh J, Freemantle N, Cleland JG. The effectiveness and relative effectiveness of intravenous inotropic drugs acting through the adrenergic pathway in patients with heart failure-a meta-regression analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(4):515-29. [MedLine]

7. Mao CT, Wang JL, Chen DY, Tsai ML, Lin YS, Cherng WJ, et al. Benefits of intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction patients in severe cardiogenic shock undergoing coronary revascularization. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160070. [MedLine]

8. Baxter GF. The natriuretic peptides. Basic Res Cardiol. 2004;99(2):71-5. [MedLine]

9. Hama N, Itoh H, Shirakami G, Nakagawa O, Suga S, Ogawa Y, et al. Rapid ventricular induction of brain natriuretic peptide gene expression in experimental acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995;92(6):1558-64. [MedLine]

10. Nishikimi T, Maeda N, Matsuoka H. The role of natriuretic peptides in cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69(2):318-28. [MedLine]

11. Michaels AD, Klein A, Madden JA, Chatterjee K. Effects of intravenous nesiritide on human coronary vasomotor regulation and myocardial oxygen uptake. Circulation. 2003;107(21):2697-701. [MedLine]

12. Lainchbury JG, Burnett JC Jr, Meyer D, Redfield MM. Effects of natriuretic peptides on load and myocardial function in normal and heart failure dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278(1):H33-40. [MedLine]

13. Chen HH, Martin FL, Gibbons RJ, Schirger JA, Wright RS, Schears RM, et al. Low-dose nesiritide in human anterior myocardial infarction suppresses aldosterone and preserves ventricular function and structure: a proof of concept study. Heart. 2009;95(16):1315-9. [MedLine]

14. Yamahara K, Itoh H, Chun TH, Ogawa Y, Yamashita J, Sawada N, et al. Significance and therapeutic potential of the natriuretic peptides/cGMP/ cGMP-dependent protein kinase pathway in vascular regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(6):3404-9.

15. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Kaye DM, Woods RL, Hastings J, Esler MD. Effects of intravenous brain natriuretic peptide on regional sympathetic activity in patients with chronic heart failure as compared with healthy control subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1221-7. [MedLine]

16. Pan Y, Zhu W, Ma J, Xin P, Han B, He Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of continuous infusion of brain natriuretic peptides on postmyocardial infarction ventricular remodeling in rats. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;104(1):17-28. [MedLine]

17. Tsuruda T, Boerrigter G, Huntley BK, Noser JA, Cataliotti A, Costello- Boerrigter LC, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide is produced in cardiac fibroblasts and induces matrix metalloproteinases. Circ Res. 2002;91(12):1127-34. [MedLine]

18. Hillock RJ, Frampton CM, Yandle TG, Troughton RW, Lainchbury JG, Richards AM. B-type natriuretic peptide infusions in acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2008;94(5):617-22. [MedLine]

19. Publication Committee for the VMAC Investigators (Vasodilatation in the Management of Acute CHF). Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287(12):1531-40. [MedLine]

20. D’Souza SP, Yellon DM, Martin C, Schulz R, Heusch G, Onody A, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide limits infarct size in rat isolated hearts via KATP channel opening. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(5):H1592-600. [MedLine]

21. Oliver PM, Fox JE, Kim R, Rockman HA, Kim HS, Reddick RL, et al. Hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and sudden death in mice lacking natriuretic peptide receptor A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(26):14730-5. [MedLine]

22. Tokudome T, Horio T, Kishimoto I, Soeki T, Mori K, Kawano Y, et al. Calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T cells pathway-dependent cardiac remodeling in mice deficient in guanylyl cyclase A, a receptor for atrial and brain natriuretic peptides. Circulation. 2005;111(23):3095-104. [MedLine]

23. Kitakaze M, Asakura M, Kim J, Shintani Y, Asanuma H, Hamasaki T, et al. Human atrial natriuretic peptide and nicorandil as adjuncts to reperfusion treatment for acute myocardial infarction (J-WIND): two randomised trials. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1483-93. [MedLine]

24. Lyu T, Zhao Y, Zhang T, Zhou W, Yang F, Ge H, et al. Natriuretic peptides as an adjunctive treatment for acute myocardial infarction: insights from the meta-analysis of 1,389 patients from 20 trials. Int Heart J. 2014;55(1):8-16. [MedLine]

25. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362-425. [MedLine]

26. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)., Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569-619. [MedLine]

27. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Werdan K. Intraaortic balloon support for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):81. [MedLine]

28. Nativi-Nicolau J, Selzman CH, Fang JC, Stenhlik J. Pharmacologic therapies for acute cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29(3):250-7. [MedLine]

29. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, et al; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779-89. [MedLine]

30. Sackner-Bernstein JD, Skopicki HA, Aaronson KD. Risk of worsening renal function with nesiritide in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Circulation. 2005;111(12):1487-91. [MedLine]

31. Dandamudi S, Chen HH. The ASCEND-HF trial: an acute study of clinical effectiveness of nesiritide and decompensated heart failure. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012;10(5):557-63. [MedLine]

32. Zhao Q, Wu TG, Lin Y, Li B, Luo JY, Wang LX. Low-dose nesiritide improves renal function in heart failure patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 2010;25(2):97-103. [MedLine]

33. Gottlieb SS, Stebbins A, Voors AA, Hasselblad V, Ezekowitz JA, Califf RM, et al. Effects of nesiritide and predictors of urine output in acute decompensated heart failure: results from ASCEND-HF (acute study of clinical effectiveness of nesiritide and decompensated heart failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(13):1177-83. [MedLine]

Article received on january 2, 2016.

Article accepted on november 28, 2016.

This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (20124245), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2013MS52) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81300177).

Authors' roles & responsibilities

YP Conception and design study; realization of operations and/or trials; analysis and/or data interpretation; statistical analysis; manuscript redaction or critical review of its content; final manuscript approval

ZGL Final manuscript approval

JH Manuscript redaction or critical review of its content; final manuscript approval

SM Realization of operations and/or trials; final manuscript approval

JM Statistical analysis; final manuscript approval

MW Final manuscript approval

The Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery is indexed in:

Supported by CNPq and CAPES, call 25/2014.



creative-commons-byAll scientific articles published at www.bjcvs.org are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Site map

All rights reserved 1997 / 2017 © Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery GN1