Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

81

Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Fetal heart assessment in the first trimester of pregnancy: influence of crown-rump length and maternal body mass index

David Baptista Silva ParesI; Angélia Iara Felipe LimaII; Edward Araújo JúniorI; Luciano Marcondes Machado NardozzaI; Wellinton P. MartinsIII; Antônio Fernandes MoronI

DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130078

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CRL: crown-rump length

CHD: Congenital Heart Disease

BMI: Body Mass Index

STIC: Spatio-temporal image correlation

INTRODUCTION

Congenital heart disease (CHD) are the most common birth defects, affecting 5-8 per 1,000 live births [1]. Early diagnosis of CHD allows better prenatal care and referral of pregnant women to tertiary center of cardiology and neonatal cardiac surgery.

Fetal cardiac assessment through abdominal approach during the examination of screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy allows the evaluation of the four-chamber plane, and enable the diagnosis of 44.8% of CHD [2]. The vaginal ultrasound has been used for almost 20 years for fetal cardiac evaluation at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy, allowing the assessment of the four-chamber plane in addition to the extended examination [3]. The three-dimensional ultrasound using spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) software has been used in the first trimester through the abdominal approach, demonstrating that cardiac volumes sent via an internet link allowed us to obtain standard cardiac planes [4].

The first trimester screening is important, not only for the calculation of risk for chromosomal defects, but also to correct dating of gestational age, assessment of some fetal malformations and determination of chorionicity in cases of twin pregnancies [5,6].

The body mass index (BMI) and crown-rump length (CRL) can be factors that influence fetal cardiac assessment in the first trimester through abdominal approach [7], however, there are no descriptions of the influence of these parameters in vaginal or STIC approaches.

The aim of this study is to assess the influence of BMI and CRL in the assessment of fetal cardiac planes, through vaginal and abdominal approaches, using B mode, color Doppler and STIC.

 

METHODS

We performed a prospective cross-sectional study with healthy pregnant women between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation, from July 2011 to July 2012. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), whereas women who agreed to participate signed a voluntary written informed consent. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies, with measurement of CRL from 45 mm to 84 mm. We performed a single measure of CRL, which also served to the correct dating of gestational age.

Patients were randomly selected, with the examinations in two Voluson 730 Expert and E8 devices (General Electric Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) equipped with volumetric convex (RAB4-8L) and endocardial (RIC5-9W) transducers. Cardiac assessment was performed by a single examiner (AIFL) immediately after the screening of the first trimester. Initially, we used the abdominal approach, associating the B mode to color Doppler, followed by vaginal approach. We aimed to obtain the plans of four heart chambers, left ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular outflow tract and aortic arch. In the plane of the four heart chambers, size, axis and symmetry of the chambers were assessed.

In the plans of the right and left ventricular outflow tract, there was the crossing of the great vessels, in addition to the similarity of their diameters. The plane of the aortic arch allowed the identification of the descending aorta. We considered "successful" when all four planes were obtained by abdominal and/or vaginal and "unsuccessful" when obtaining three or fewer plans.

After the two-dimensional evaluation, the assessment was performed by STIC associated with color Doppler. A four-dimensional assessment was performed immediately after the two-dimensional, starting with an abdominal approach, followed by vaginal. The acquisition of the STIC volumes was performed in the plane of the four heart chambers, wherever possible with the fetal back at 6h, with a scan time of 10 seconds and aperture angle of 20º.

The maximum scan time for each method was 30 minutes. All women returned at the age between 20 and 24 weeks for completion of two-dimensional echocardiography, in order to confirm normal fetal heart anatomy. The women were not followed-up, not being obtained their neonatal outcomes.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). To assess the influence of BMI and CRL in fetal cardiac evaluation by abdominal and vaginal approaches, we used the unpaired t test. We used a significance level of P<0.05.

 

RESULTS

We assessed 57 pregnant women between 12 and 14 weeks (19 patients in each gestational age) who agreed to participate in the study, and 4 were not included because they had not the CRL > 84 mm. Therefore, for final statistical analysis were considered 53 pregnant women. The average maternal age was 27.8 ± 5.5 years (range of 14-39 years). The average CRL was 71.5 ± 8.6 mm (range of 55.9 to 84 mm). The median maternal BMI was 23.8 ± 2.6 kg/m2 (range of 17.5 to 29.9 kg/m2).

BMI did not influence the performance of the methods (B mode, color Doppler and STIC) when using the vaginal approach, but in the abdominal approach, although with no statistically significant differences, the findings suggest that it is more difficult for a satisfactory examination as BMI increases (Table 1). Regarding the CRL, there was greater failure rate in assessing through vaginal approach when using color Doppler and B modes (P<0.01) (Table 2).

 

 

DISCUSSION

In this study we assessed the influence of BMI and CRL in evaluating standardized cardiac planes between 12-14 weeks of gestation, through abdominal and vaginal approaches, through B mode, Color Doppler and spatio-temporal image correlation. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature with similar methodology.

Obstetric oltrasonography of obese women is difficult and in some situations can become a real challenge for physicians. In a study comparing obese women (BMI > 30kg/m2) versus non-obese pregnant women (BMI < 30kg/m2) who underwent second trimester ultrasound, it was found that suboptimal visualization rates increased significantly in obese group, both for the heart (37% versus 19%) and fetal column (43% vs. 29%) [8].

In the first trimester, only one study assessede the influence of BMI on fetal cardiac evaluation [7]. In this study, 103 pregnant women between 11 and 13 weeks and 6 days were examined, through abdominal approach using B mode and, in some cases, associated with color Doppler. They did not found no influence of BMI in cardiac assessment (P=0.752) [7]. Similarly, in our study, assessing 54 pregnant women between 12 and 14 weeks, there was also no influence of BMI. One possible explanation would be the fact that at the end of the first trimester, most of the women maintains prepregnancy BMI, in addition, the mean BMI of our group was 23.8 kg/m2, and no pregnant woman had a BMI> 30kg/m2. Other studies have reported the influence of maternal BMI as a visualization of the fetal heart in the first trimester of pregnancy [9-11]. Even the guideline of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) for fetal cardiac evaluation refers to a technical limitation in the case of obese patients, due to acoustic shadows in the third trimester. They reported the need for assessments at different times, in addition to optimization of the device and focus adjustment, frequency, gain, magnification, temporal and harmonic [12] resolution. In relation to the influence of CRL, we observed failure rate statistically significant only for the group assessed by vaginal approach using color Doppler and B mode (P<0.01). In a previous study of the screening in the first trimester, the CRL showed a factor of influence on quality of nuchal translucency measurement [13]. Regarding fetal cardiac evaluation, there is only one study that assessed the influence of the CRL [7].

In this study, the authors observed no influence of CRL in fetal cardiac assessment (P=0.899), with a mean of CRL of 72.1 mm [7], however, it was performed only the assessment by laparotomy. In our study, the mean CRL was 71.5 mm and we used the abdominal and vaginal approaches in all cases. The higher failure rate in vaginal approach is due to the need for prior learning curve, plus the need for experienced examiners to obtain the standardized cardiac plans. In a study by Vimpeli et al. [ 14 ], who assessed 584 fetuses with CRL between 41 and 78 mm, the rate of success in getting all cardiac plans was only 58%.

As limitation of the study, we noted that all pregnant women were randomly selected, so that the results were adversely affected due to the absence of women with BMI > 30kg/ m2. Maybe if we had selected patients knowingly obese or with certain diseases prior to pregnancy such as diabetes mellitus we could infer the real impact of maternal BMI in assessing the quality of fetal cardiac examination in the first trimester of pregnancy.

 

CONCLUSION

Concluding, we found no influence of the index of body mass and crown-rump length in fetal cardiac assessment between 12-14 weeks gestation. The assessment through vaginal approach needs more prior training, and experienced examiners in this pathway. Subsequent studies using populations of previously obese women are needed to prove the real influence of body mass index in fetal cardiac assessment in the first trimester of pregnancy.

REFERENCES

1. Sharland G. Routine fetal cardiac screening: what are we doing and what should we do? Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(13):1123-9. [MedLine]

2. Eleftheriades M, Tsapakis E, Sotiriadis A, Manolakos E, Hassiakos D, Botsis D. Detection of congenital heart defects throughout pregnancy: impact of first trimester ultrasound screening for cardiac abnormalities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2546-50. [MedLine]

3. Achiron R, Weissman A, Rotstein Z, Lipitz S, Mashiach S, Hegesh J. Transvaginal echocardiographic examination of the fetal heart between 13 and 15 weeks' gestation in a low-risk population. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13(10):783-9. [MedLine]

4. Viñals F, Ascenzo R, Naveas R, Huggon I, Giuliano A. Fetal echocardiography at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks using four-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation telemedicine via an Internet link: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):633-8. [MedLine]

5. Novotná M, Hašlík L, Svabík K, Zizka Z, Belošovicová H, Brešták M, et al. Detection of fetal major structural anomalies at the 11-14 ultrasound scan in an unselected population. Ceska Gynekol. 2012;77(4):330-5. [MedLine]

6. Dias T, Arcangeli T, Bhide A, Napolitano R, Mahsud-Dornan S, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(5):530-2. [MedLine]

7. Abu-Rustum RS, Ziade MF, Abu-Rustum SE. Learning curve and factors influencing the feasibility of performing fetal echocardiography at the time of the first-trimester scan. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(5):695-700. [MedLine]

8. Hendler I, Blackwelll SC, Bujold E, Treadwelll MC,Wolfe HM, Sokoll RJ, Sorokin J. The impact of maternal obesity on midtrimester sonographic visualization of fetal cardiac and craniospinal structures. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(12):1607-11. [MedLine]

9. Cook AC, Yates RW, Anderson RH. Normal and abnormal fetal cardiac anatomy. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(13):1032-48. [MedLine]

10. Simpson J. Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac function in the fetus. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(13):1081-91. [MedLine]

11. Lohr PA, Reeves MF, Creinin MD. A comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for determination of gestational age and clinical outcomes in women undergoing early medical abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(3):240-4. [MedLine]

12. Fetal Echocardiography Task Force; American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Clinical Standards Committee; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(1):127-36. [MedLine]

13. Zohav E, Dunsky A, Segal O, Peled R, Herman A, Segal S. The effects of maternal and fetal parameters on the quality of nuchal translucency measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):638-40. [MedLine]

14. Vimpelli T, Huhtala H, Acharya G. Fetal echocardiography during routine first-trimester screening: a feasibility study in an unselected population. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(5):475-82. [MedLine]

No financial support.

Authors' roles & responsibilities

DBSP: Main coordinatination

AIFL: Data collection

EAJ: Preparation of the article for publication

LMMN: Adjunct coordenation

WPM: Statistical analysis

AFM: Final review

Article receive on Sunday, April 28, 2013

CCBY All scientific articles published at bjcvs.org are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2019 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY